A dictionary of thoughts, the floats, flux, and fire flies. @wiki 32687 2007-07-19T05:55:06Z @wiki::48/ 2007-07-19 2007-07-19T05:55:06Z

Internet, the   the Human-customised Planet Earth. Explore The Internet  

@wiki::47/ 2007-07-13 2007-07-13T04:57:23Z

  Academic Blog Blogs are written because, first of all, there are some things that people want to express. Blog is the solution of this expression in ways that in functions as a place or a space for expressions of and about things. What expressed in blog can be anything. From raw to defined. Impossibility to inexistence.  The origin of blog apart from the content itself is composed of two elements mainly. First is the “free” virtual space called “world wide web” along with its immediate access giving the “power” of free expression to those in need of expression. Second is the unsure feeling of being refused by the set of “standards” required by “the other place” available for expression particular types of expression of particular groups of people. Therefore, not only does the blog function as a place for expression that is free of rules or tight standard to be fulfilled, also is it a place for an escape!

@wiki::46/ 2007-07-13 2007-07-13T04:28:12Z

Limitation       Limitation is what people always turn the blind eye to. Limitation is undesirable. It is something people don’t like because it represents, show, and assure human’s “imability”.         All the time, human try to find ways to improve their ability in doing things. So what they will hate the most is the opposite side of doing so—limitation.

@wiki::45/ 2007-07-07 2007-07-07T03:24:47Z

      Blank           There is no absolute emptiness and nothingness in this world; there is only a being of emptiness within which almost everything is possible. The fact that it is called “emptiness” or “nothing” is only another limitation of language which works as a guardian against fear and dreadful uncertainty. The easiest example for this would be that a “thing” is not an opposite word of “nothing”.

@wiki::44/ 2007-07-06 2007-07-06T04:42:42Z

  Parallel History   Termed right at this moment by the Dibrinian concept, PARALLEL HISTORY is the two stories about the same event with different angles which can be totally opposite to each other.   For example, the events in the history of one country may not be the same thing in the history of its neighbouring country. It can even be offensive to them in case of occurring conflicts, if any.   The Parallel History is a good demonstration of interpretations, judgements, and prejudice involving in writing stories. This proves once again that history isn’t any more credible than those we have heard of.   Another angle that Dibrini would like to think about the Parallel History is that when a story is a “history” to one group of people, it might be only a rumour or even a false story to other group of people. The world has its own history, the story of human races and animals and cultures and civilisations. On the other hand, human see the story about aliens and lives outside the planet earth as something that still has to be proved true. They might not see it this way (if there is a “they” out there”). Everything that has been written about those outside the earth can best be only “a fiction” or a little better “a science-fiction”—it can never be a history.   Do human know that their history, the story about themselves, can only be a Parallel History for “the others”?

@wiki::43/ 2007-07-06 2007-07-06T04:32:54Z

        HISTORY     There are so many things in this word. Origin, development, directions, innovation, evolution, change, metamorphosis, power, race, gender, domination.     First of all, not everyone gets to write the content of history. Only important persons get to write history; as the matter of fact, only what theythinkshould be history are recorded as history. In the process of history formation (by those who get to write it), topics are “selected” out of many others that are “less” important. Here, there lies a considerable amount of judgement onwhat are more and less important than othersthat should be written as history. It is not only the judgement itself but the judgement of a group of people (not everyone involved in the content of history).     It is fair to say then that history is only another kind of story like such things as bedtime story, ghost story, and rumours. It is not always true. It may be not true at all in some cases. Like all other stories, it is up to our own judgement (again) what to believe or not to believe. Human may praise history over other types of story but really there is no rigid evidence that history is more credible than all those we have heard.   Interpretation   Human essences

@wiki::42/ 2007-07-04 2007-07-04T06:18:58Z

=='''Dictionary'''== Here is the place where things are defined with human language tools that has been built to ease the exchange of understanding. However, this purpose of this tool limits the understanding of the ultimate reality by building a perceptual wall against one. Therefore, dictionary based on the construction of language is the where the limitation of interpretation and understanding of reality and things in it is “clearly” defined. It frames what should be seen and what shouldn’t about things. There are so many examples around human activities of this Dibrinian claim. For example, human call the used meaning outside their dictionary of a word inside the dictionary “a slang”. Not long after that, they realise that they have to include that meaning in their dictionary for reason that they WANT the dictionary to be the place where everything is defined. Now the dictionary either gets fatter and fatter, or grows into many categories of dictionary such as scientific dictionary, music dictionary, Shakespearean dictionary, dictionary of slangs, etc. When human have too many types of dictionary, they start to compare the meaning of the same word from different dictionaries to see if they fit the meaning human are looking for. And none of those does. And there comes yet another slang to be included into one of those dictionaries in the near future. After a while, they will need “a dictionary of dictionaries”. So, having gone through this one might be able to the INABILITY of setting things in place one of which is defining meanings of things. It is when human can get across their line of ego. And only then is when their true truth becomes visible.

@wiki::41/ 2007-07-04 2007-07-04T06:59:55Z

=='''Subcommunication'''== Because of at least one component of communication is uncontrollable, the whole communication is made uncontrollable. Dibrini would like to call this uncontrollable component SUBCOMMUNICATION. A Subcommunication can be the hidden message(s) within the main (obvious) message sent and received on the surface of communication. This is a level of robotic communication in human communication. However, another level of human communication is the Subcommunication in which there are several of messages floating to be detected by communicators’ ability of interpretation. Subcommunication is uncontrollable because, first of all, one cannot control others and, second, one does not seem to have a total control over oneself. This results in that the message and its hidden contents are not totally controlled by the sender, that how the message is sent is not controlled, and that the interpretation of the receivers cannot be controlled by the sender. Even in the simplest form of communication, all of these then generate Subcommunication.

@wiki::40/ 2007-07-04 2007-07-04T06:08:12Z

    COMMUNICATION     The most recent exemplification of communicational behaviour of human is BIG BROTHER, the most intense communication scenario that can be thought of in all time. In BIG BROTHER, the contexts, environment, and habits of communication are captured and forced to perform in one intense circumstance in which all the “communicators” are not able to avoid these elements of their communication. This is because the nature of the game itself is that the one who communicates the best wins. Not only all the communicators have to communicate to one another, but have they also to communicate with the public who is watching on outside as well. Many communication games seen in the BIG BROTHER show includes groupthink syndrome, social loafing, majority vote, domination, resistance, game-playing, conflict resolution behaviour, being in or under the radar, and many more. The situation there in the show becomes intense because of the fact that everyone is aware of the communication game they are dealing with. In the game, they expect the sincerity and living a “genuine” type of communication as much as possible. Whereas in normal life human communication game does not require full-time attendance from the communicators, the communicators have their time out from being game players. Dibrini looks at communication as something that can’t be explained or defined because of its interactions with human behaviour and psychology. Therefore, communication game obviously cannot demonstrate or experiment the mechanism of communication. As the matter of fact, it has been something yet to be explored at all time.  

@wiki::39/ 2007-06-26 2007-06-26T12:28:26Z

      ART   Art is the not of the nature; art is only what created by human. And because the word ART is defined in the pleasant and praiseworthy term, ARTs therefore can only be things that are accepted and admired by at least a group of human of the importance, the discourse, and the reality that ART possesses.